On working hard
By Mark Vernon on Saturday, November 7 2009, 09:02 - Happiness - Permalink

From Life Class, the Evening Standard column I share with others from The School of Life.
It’s often remarked that people work too hard. At four in the morning, city traders can be seen jogging through Shoreditch, exercising before hitting their desks. At lunchtime, sandwich bars are packed with office workers grabbing a bite, even as they read a magazine telling them that a proper break will do wonders for their happiness. In the early evening, commuter trains are full of folk checking their email on handheld devices that were supposed to increase their leisure, not bring the office back home. We’re all workaholics now.
And yet, I suspect the problem is not so much that we work too hard. Rather, it’s that we work hard without being quite sure what we’re working for.
Consider the story of Cleanthes, the ancient Greek. He arrived in Athens, from a place way out of town, after something of a midlife crisis. He’d been a boxer, though now fed up with that, he wanted to wrestle with life and the best ideas. The trouble was he had only four drachma in his pocket, roughly four days wages for a skilled worker. Unlike many of his aristocratic philosopher peers – the likes of Aristotle and Epicurus – he would have to fund his studies. So he took up gardening by night, in order to philosophize by day. He became known as ‘the water-carrier.’
Other citizens were seriously impressed with his application. After a few months of this arduous regime, they awarded him an honorarium of ten minas, roughly three months wages for a skilled worker. It was the ancient equivalent of a student grant. In return, he wrote them a poem. In it, he extolled his fellows not to be swept along by blind desires, for if you live like that, you risk destroying your principles, your relationships, your passions. Don’t work hard and miss what you want, he advised.
Cleanthes wasn’t offering the trite self-help tip, simply to work less. He thought it is good to work hard and, after all, it is only human to want more and to devote your life to the pursuit of it. But he’d opted for a simple trade, the gardening, in order to preserve his energies for his main love, the philosophy. It’s rather like the novelist and poet, Adam Foulds, who took menial jobs that paid in order to fund his writing, which at first didn’t.
So the trick is this. Don’t not work hard. But do keep a check on whether you are working for what you really desire.










Comments
Hmm. A bit twee, perhaps? Most people I know work too hard because they'd be sacked if they didn't. Now I don't mix with knowledge workers, or besuited types for the most part, so my sample is mostly at the blue-collar end of the spectrum.
I hate every damned minute of every damned job I've ever done. I've tried not-working and ended up on the street, so that wasn't much fun. I've tried various means to get into more interesting lines of work, but in the end lacked the necessary abilities. So ordinary paid wage-slavery it is, in order to achieve the minimum dignity necessary for life to be worth continuing with.
But please remember when you're tempted towards the effete end of the spectrum that many of us just don't get choices in these things.
BC - Brevity risks tweeness, you're not wrong in that: thanks for the warning! But you say you don't mix with 'knowledge workers'. I wonder why. You can obviously write.
That was a more gracious response than my irritated comment merited. But, still, the source of the irritation is real. Now that people are starting at last to write about work, the writing invariably revolves around issues that concern the representing classes (overwork, meaning, parental leave, handling bosses, etc). For many of us (I'd guess a large minority in wealthy countries; just about everyone elsewhere), work is no more than a necessarily-endured torment ("issues" are moot). It doesn't particularly matter which of us slip in and out of this fraction: it will remain pretty constant (our economies need armies of shoe-shiners to allow middle-class attention to stay fixed on consumption, and can only ensure their cooperation by restricting the availability of meaningful work).
I used to whinge that novels rarely tackled much about work despite its centrality to life, but eventually became reconciled to the likelihood that, if successful, novelists didn't really know much about other forms of work, or, if not, their day jobs were probably one of the humiliations that their writing was an attempt to try and escape from. Perhaps it's inevitable that as work does start to get represented, the issues canvassed are going to to look a little distant to most of us.
BC - and then there were blogs...
Many of the blogs I've enjoyed reading are the ones that give an insight into the jobs/workplaces I am unfamiliar with (most of them are anonymised, for obvious reasons).
You write really well. Go on - start a blog! And post the link here. :)
Dear Mark,
Thanks for a very insightful blog on "working hard". Its about knowing what matters to us in life. Being able to preserve our energy and focus on what is important to us allows us to fulfil our dreams. Too much force can push opportunities away and if we work ourselves to the ground we simply won't notice them. Not "working hard" doesn't mean being lazy, it means that we trust life enough to allow opportunities to enter our life. When we co-create our dreams with the universe, not only do we feel supported, we also know that we are building a meaningful life that has a strong foundation.
Keep writing.
Thanks
Annette
interesting information sharing with me